Section "Publication ethics" The editorial staff of the journal relies on the norms of publishing ethics established in the scientific community. This implies: compliance of published articles with modern standards of scientific research; the possibility of presentation of author's points of view, which may not coincide with the opinion of the editorial board; publication of materials corresponding to the main scientific areas of the journal; objective unbiased review of the manuscripts submitted for consideration; timely notification of authors about the stages of the passage of the manuscript; providing the author with reasoned justification in case of rejection of the manuscript; the author's consent to the reduction and editing of the manuscript text, which does not change it in a semantic sense. In accordance with ethical rules and norms adopted by leading international scientific publishing houses, the editors adopted ethical principles, the observance of which is mandatory for all participants in the process of publishing scientific materials - for authors, reviewers and members of the editorial board. 1. Authors responsibility 1.1. By submitting an article to the editor, the author confirms that this article is not under consideration in the editorial office of another journal, and that it was not published earlier. 1.2. The authors are responsible for the content of the article. The articles should use only original scientific data. In the case of borrowing materials, other researchers should make the appropriate correct reference. The results discussed in the article must meet the criterion of reproducibility by other researchers. All data processing methods, as well as the logic of their interpretation, must be absolutely transparent. 1.3. The authors are responsible for free or involuntary plagiarism. Unauthorized borrowing and reproduction of any elements of the article (text, graphics, primary data, etc.) are absolutely unacceptable. Borrowed elements reproduced with the consent of the rightholders should be presented in the correct form and be accompanied by an appropriate reference. 1.4. The authors are responsible for identifying the sources of financial support for the project, the results of which are described in the article submitted for review, as well as for indicating the persons who contributed to the research. 1.5. Information received in private, i.e. in correspondence, conversation or discussion with third parties, or obtained during the provision of confidential services, may be used or communicated only if authorized in writing from the source of such information. 1.6. If the author finds a significant error or inaccuracy in his own already published article, he must immediately notify the editor of [mag_title] or the publisher and cooperate with the editor on revoking or correcting the publication. If the editor or publisher learns from a third party that the published work contains a significant error and informs the author of such a shortcoming, it is the author's responsibility to promptly send corrections or provide evidence to the editors about the correctness of the data in his / her article. 1.7. The author can initiate the publication of an article that has already been published in the native language, in translation. Such cases are subject to special consideration at a meeting of the editorial board, subject to the obligatory observance of ethical principles by all the parties involved. 1.8. The author undertakes to issue the text of the manuscript in accordance with the editorial rules. 2. The responsibility of the editors of the journal 2.1. The editorial board of the journal accepts previously unpublished articles, which represent an original scientific study or a detailed review of a topic corresponding to the general direction of the journal. All scientific articles entering the journal are checked for plagiarism by the "Anti-plagiarism" system. In case of detection of a previously published work that repeats the results of the article under consideration by more than 30% according to the results of the "Anti-plagiarism" test, the editorial board reserves the right to refuse to publish the article. 2.2. The editors of the journal are responsible for making decisions on the articles proposed for consideration. The reason for the decision of the editorial board of the journal on accepting an article for publication or refusing to publish is the exclusively scientific value of the article, its significance for scientific progress and the quality of the preparation. 2.3. The editors of the journal and members of the editorial board of the journal are not allowed to disclose information on articles received by the editor to anyone, except for a narrow circle of persons who are directly involved in the article and the process of preparing it for publication. 2.4. The editors of the journal should, in the course of reviewing the articles, thoroughly examine the original information contained in them, but they under no circumstances have the right to use it in their own research or for other personal purposes. Use of such information is allowed only after the official publication